The Town (2010)

There used to be a time where it seemed like Ben Affleck couldn't catch a break in Hollywood, but fast forward years later and it's almost as if he took the scenic route towards respectability.

Taking a page out of Clint Eastwood's playbook, Affleck went behind the camera for 2007's "Gone Baby Gone" and not only garnered praise for his directorial debut but, in the process, proved that he had more to offer than we had thought.

But let's be honest. At the end of the day it was still Ben Affleck and people were going to have an opinion one way or another; but with "The Town", Affleck proves definitively that he's a force to be reckoned with and what he delivers here on screen is damn near cinematic gold.

Quite the compliment considering this is only the second film he's directed, but Affleck just has a knack for surrounding himself with the right material/actors and that's what makes "The Town" so unique. Not enough can be said about the performances here as they are key in this film; and as much of it is Affleck as a director to capture that, he does it with such ease that it really brings out the best in everybody involved.

The same can be said for the film's story. Not only is it as gripping as say "The Departed", but its sharp attention to detail and its gritty portrayal of the conflict between these cops and robbers (so to speak) will, surely, grip the viewer all the way through until the bloody end.

Without giving anything away, "The Town" is one of those films you just have to see for yourself. But, to be fair, no movie is perfect. The 123 minutes of running time made the film overly long, but not so much that it felt as if a frame of that was wasted. Every second is essential in its own, unique way and, in the end, "The Town" makes for quite the stay. If not, for one of the better movies of 2010.

Rating: 4 ½ inkblots out of 5

Devil (2010)

Whatever magic M. Night Shyamalan used to capture "The Sixth Sense" seems lost almost as, nowadays, his films are met with more precarity than curiosity. Sure, "Unbreakable" was unique enough to stand on its own; but it's no secret as to why "Signs", "The Village", "Lady in the Water", and the God awful train wreck that was "The Happening" has made a lot of people question whether Shyamalan will ever be anything more than just a "one-trick pony".

Which is sad when you really think about it. For a person to be as talented as he is, the ugly stigma that's been given to him is the "Shyamalan twist" and it's damn near impossible to ignore whenever you watch one of his movies. You're always going to question when that ONE moment is going to come (a' la "The Sixth Sense") but, with "Devil", that moment never does. And, for that, I think it's a sign towards a step in the right direction. Either that, or redemption.

Nevertheless, it's not to say that this film doesn't have its fair share of twists and turns. Shyamalan's unique take on the supernatural is something I've marveled at for quite some time now and I think it's the one thing that keeps people interested in his films. No other filmmaker is as masterful when it comes to this particular brand of art and this is why "Devil" works in so many ways.

For instance, take the simple premise of five strangers being trapped in an elevator. The emotional weight of the film is dependent upon the audience to be intrigued as to which of the characters is more than they appear to be and, indeed, this is done as elegantly as it possibly could. Every word and/or action by each character can easily be looked at with an ulterior motive and, up until the final reveal, the action both inside and out of the elevator is crafted well enough to tie the story all together.

The only question, however, is will it be enough to pull people in to see it. M. Night's name being attached to any project would bring a lot of skepticism to it (think "The Last Airbender", for example) but the fact that this was NOT directed by Shyamalan should be dually noted. It was only produced by him and I think it was smart on his part to allow someone else to interpret his vision for a change.

Ultimately, "Devil" will not jump start an otherwise stale, horror movie genre; but one thing it will do is help in re-establishing the M. Night Shyamalan brand. This, by far, is his most complete work to date since "Unbreakable" and just like that film, this, too, is nothing more than a good ol' battle between good and evil. Just with a little bit of "faith" thrown in.

Rating: 3 inkblots out of 5

Funny People

The success Judd Apatow has had ever since the release of The 40-Year-Old Virgin has been enough to garner him a pass when it comes to the many projects he has since executive produced along the way; but it's his own unique blend of "raunchy dramedy" that seems to draw people into his work.

Just look at the critical acclaim that came with, again, The 40-Year-Old Virgin and Knocked Up. While both films featured over-the-top subject matter, the depth of Apatow's creative writing allowed viewers to see the lighthearted side of what he was trying to get across on screen and with Funny People, Apatow may have just delivered his most grown up film to date.

But at what costs? To say that many people may be turned off by what Funny People actually is too much of a blanketed statement but, still, that should not take away from how brilliantly creative this movie really is. Instead, Apatow, who has always had a high, character driven approach to his films, crafts yet another ingenuous story around such flawed characters and the end result on screen is damn near comedic gold.

Especially when considering all the talent that was assembled to make this film. The always funny Seth Rogen is great here as George's assistant, Ira; but what I found even more intriguing was the chemistry of all the lesser known actors/comedians with one another. Jason Schwartzman, Jonah Hill, Aubrey Plaza, and Leslie Mann all compliment Adam and Seth really well and, again, I guess that all goes back to the depth that Judd Apatow has as a writer/director. Clearly his sense of direction rubs off on everybody involved and, last I checked, that kind of thing makes for a great movie. Not to mention, some pretty great improv.

Which, I'm sure a lot of the film turned out to be as compared to what was actually scripted beforehand. That kind of thing is routine for an Apatow film but here, especially, it works really well for the "heavy" subplot that lies at the heart of the story.

Now, while I won't give anything away, what I will say is that Funny People will be hit or miss for some people. It's long running time does become a distraction at times but, in the grand scheme of things, the one thing this film does prove is that laughter really is the best medicine. Just ask George Simmons.

Rating: 3 inkblots out of 5

Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen

The commercial press for Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen is [somewhat] misleading if you ask me. Not only is this film a microcosm of its stellar predecessor, but that same wonderment that came along with it seems to be replaced with a convoluted plot that extends beyond nothing more than a multitude of slow motion explosions and just another opportunity to sell more action figures.

Which is quite the reality that is Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen. Albeit ravenous fan boys will argue in its defense; the fact of the matter is that this film is just not very good. Nothing about it makes any more special than summer blockbusters of years past; and it's disappointing in a sense to see such a well established franchise such as Transformers sell its own soul for the sake of a dollar. It just doesn't make sense (literally or figuratively) and I solely place the blame on the shoulders of Michael Bay.

His vision for over-the-top action sequences has become a proverbial crutch throughout his career and, after a while, the monotony of it all starts to wear ridiculously thin. Still, it was I that praised Michael Bay for finding the perfect balance the first time around and, in watching this sequel, I could hardly get a feel for what the director was trying to get across on screen. Save for the racial undertones perhaps, Megan Fox's significant screen time was the only other thing that was obvious; and what can I say, I was just not impressed much by that either.

But in every dark cloud lies a silver lining, I suppose, and one movie will do little to tarnish Transformers as a bankable entity. Besides, the first film had a strong enough foundation to garner this film a pass; and I fully expect Michael Bay and company to right the ship the next time around. Well...at least one could only hope anyway.

Rating: 2 ½ inkblots out of 5

Next Day Air

It would be easy to criticize Next Day Air for its innocuous use of stereotypes or even for its [somewhat] predictable plot but, to do so, would not save this movie from being worse than it already is. Instead, it would be better suited to lament this film for ever being made in the first place.

Far be it from me to pass judgment on something I’m quite sure was time consuming, yet required little to no effort to write; but just in watching, one can easily tell that not much thought went into the creative process. It’s bad enough movies with an all black cast are downtrodden enough as it is and, sure enough, Next Day Air is no exception.

Directed by Benny Boom, Next Day Air is nothing more than an urban crime drama with a little bit of satire, as well as action, thrown in for good measure. Now, on paper, the added involvement of Mike Epps would seem like a surefire project that a lot of people would be dying to check out but, trust me, none of the above elements work well together whatsoever. In fact, it almost feels as if everything was slapped together and the end result is that of which you can’t help but watch mindlessly, wondering why the hell you just paid to see it. Not to mention, the acting isn't all that great either.

Yet and still, I guess the films only saving grace is that of Yasmin Deliz. Her feisty and charismatic portrayal of Chita breathes a little bit of life into the movie and her presence also makes for some rather nice eye candy.

In the end, is it enough to make the movie watchable? By all means no, but it all depends on your preference. I, for one, found nothing in particular to be remotely entertaining about Next Day Air, yet some will argue that it's the best thing since sliced bread. To each's own, I suppose; but, in this case, I think return to sender would've been the perfect label for it. You be the judge.

Rating: 1 inkblot out of 5

Observe and Report

Seth Rogen’s likeable personality has persevered in movies such as The 40-Year Old Virgin & Superbad, however, Observe and Report is an interesting vehicle for him in that it never really quite works as it’s [clearly] intended to. For lack of better words, Observe and Report is not the laugh out loud movie one would expect going in and, in watching, you can’t help but feel a little guilty for actually paying to see it.

Sure, what’s a couple dollars here or there especially if a good laugh is involved; but if that laugh never comes, isn’t that warrant enough to ask for your money back. That’s exactly how I felt afterward and the thing I don’t get is how coy the producers could be in marketing this film. Not only is it a blatant rip off of another mall cop movie we’ve already seen (Paul Blart: Mall Cop), but it uses Seth Rogen’s name as a way to pull in his legion of fans. Do not be fooled, I mind you, this is not Knocked Up, nor is it Zack and Miri. Instead, Observe and Report stands alone in Seth Rogen’s catalog and will, undoubtedly, be regarded as his first misstep along his recent string of hits.

Be that as it may, I understand that Observe and Report is a black comedy and that things that are considered taboo are fair play; but, honestly, what’s funny about date rape? You have to be one fucked up individual to laugh at something like that and I, my friend, am not that.

To each his own I suppose, but the real problem lies within the fact that Observe and Report never makes up its mind on what it wants to be. It’s “Napoleon Dynamite-esque” awkwardness resonates throughout the 86 minutes or so of running time and, even still, the characters you come in contact with leave no lasting impression whatsoever. Instead, all the audience can do is be polarized about what they're seeing on screen and, speaking honestly, I was just not impressed one bit.

Love it or hate it aside, I guess what I’m trying to say is that Observe and Report is disappointing in more ways than one. Not only is it a second rate, mall cop comedy, but to watch it and marvel at how much time and talent was wasted on something as mindless as this is remarkable. Therefore, like the title suggests, Observe and Report is nothing more than a defense mechanism for how I feel the writers/producers pieced all this crap together. Nothing about this movie is organized and the sad thing about it is that 75% of the people that see this will probably feel the same way that I do. Need I say more?

Rating: 1 inkblot out of 5

The Secret Life of Bees

The funny thing about life is that all of its lessons are never fully explained. Instead, a vast majority remain vague and open ended for self interpretation; and, with The Secret Life of Bees, I think this film profoundly explores that truth.

Based on the New York Times best seller, The Secret Life of Bees is not only masterful in what it represents but, from a sense of belonging, it [also] enriches the concept of “sense of self”. Naturally, we as human beings have this longing to belong and to be denied that is somewhat a slight against nature. To say we were dependent [as well] would be [somewhat] of a fair assessment but, then again, it is the actions of those around us that shape our lives. Therefore, in relation to The Secret Life of Bees, I think it’s fair to say that this film is the proverbial pulse for when it comes to human life. A pretty bold statement, I’m sure, but allow me to explain.

Set against a racially divided, 1964 South Carolina backdrop , The Secret Life of Bees is [essentially] about a young girl named Lilly (Dakota Fanning). Disenchanted with the life she leads with her father, Lilly seems more intent on finding where she belongs and sets out to do just that. Along with her black “stand-in” mother, Rosa (Jennifer Hudson); her and Rosa embark on a journey to find her home away from home and, along the way, life’s lessons begin to unravel. So much so that carrying a blurred memory of the night her mother was killed is enough to trigger an inconvenient truth for Lilly.

Now, being that I’m not one for spoilers, I won’t delve into what exactly that “truth” is; but I will say that The Secret Life of Bees is articulately masterful in it‘s approach. Not only is this story genuine, but it’s rich and sharp attention towards detail goes a long way and director Gina Prince-Bythewood is successfully poignant in capturing such raw, human emotion on screen. Not only is her take deeply satisfying, but it’s almost compelling to think that something this luscious could be translated from print to the big screen.

Whatever the case, The Secret Life of Bees is a must see and almost serves as a sign of hope. Regardless of who you are, we all feel desolate at one time or another and this film speaks to the universal longing to be loved.

Rating: 3 ½ inkblots out of 5

Lakeview Terrace

Race and morality are one thing, but what happens when things of that nature become blurred in the name of justice? That’s the question that’s proposed in the dark thriller Lakeview Terrace; and while it executes things masterfully on the surface, it also makes it a point to question the infrastructure of our society.

Are we really bound/subjugated to harassment in our very own neighborhoods? Of course not, nor should we ever have to be, but color always seems to be the dividing line. Racism, while not as openly practiced as it once was, is still alive and when you combine that state of mind with an hypocritical oath of “to serve and protect”, who’s really at fault? Us for believing it? Or, us for allowing it to happen? You be the judge.

Starring Samuel L. Jackson, Lakeview Terrace is somewhat of an unorthodox thriller in that it takes the issue of racism and gives it a “novel twist“. Even in it’s most villainous form, the most heinous individual is one that lacks ignorance; and as Abel Turner, Samuel L. Jackson displays his character’s inner most hatred as effortlessly as one could imagine.

Fueled by a blind passion, the subplot of this movie is even more intricate than most would expect. On the surface, harassment seems like a moot point when considering what all else is involved; but it’s the motive of Abel Turner that draws you in along the way. Is he racist? Crooked? So many questions abound until the big reveal and, even then, it all revolves back to an issue of morality. Not to say that it justifies his actions, but his torment towards Patrick Wilson and Kerry Washington’s characters is the perfect example of what’s wrong with our society today.

Let’s face it. Interracial dating is still a touchy subject in this day and age and I think Lakeview Terrace explores this ugly side of truth pretty accurately. It would’ve been easy to have reversed the roles and have had Abel been white, but I think you lose a certain element when you do so. Instead, as it stands, Lakeview Terrace is remarkable in that it doesn’t get caught up in what some consider taboo and, when you combine that with all the social aspects involved, it’s play on the human conscience makes for more than what your money’s worth.

Rating: 3 inkblots out of 5

Saw V

When it comes to ambiguity, the Saw franchise has been fairly consistent since day one. Each film represents a piece to the overall puzzle and with another Saw already in the works, it really makes you wonder when all this is going to end.

Sure, at first, people praised Saw for it’s ingenious and originality, but now this whole franchise is becoming dry and disinteresting. Too many sequels can be malignant in their efforts and therein lies the biggest problem with this latest installment. Instead of adding anything of value, Saw V is nothing more than a feeble attempt to maintain relevance and I, for one, can no longer support mediocrity. It’s one thing to buy into something that was once heralded as a fresh, new twist on the horror genre, but now things have gotten a little out of hand. Allow me to explain.

It’s not so much the fact that Saw V is a bad movie, but more so that it stands out when compared to the quality of work of previous installments. I’ll admit, each film has gotten progressively worse in succession; but I solely attribute that to this whole “smart” horror movie mantra. So many people have bought into the “hidden” themes of these movies (I, myself, included) and it almost feels as though it’s one big circle. Nothing is ever fully explained and instead of expanding on things, themes, and ideas you would expect, the audience is left with even more questions than they had going in to begin with.

Is that a bad thing? Yes and no, I suppose, but it depends on how you look at it. No, from the standpoint of the writers and producers because, obviously, the Saw franchise has proven to be a bankable entity; but yes from the view of a fan because there’s no real sense of a payoff. Meaning, ultimately, we as fans are the ones getting jerked around in the end.

Which leads me to this convoluted mess we call Saw V. No amount of originality could save this lifeless piece of work and, in watching, you can really tell that the writers have become [somewhat] uninspired. That undeniable essence that made Saw what it was is no longer there and some would argue that it [too] died along with the decision to kill off Jigsaw.

Ultimately a dire decision considered by some, the death of Jigsaw raised a lot of eyebrows because it hindered the amount of possibilities that could be done with the story henceforth. Limiting your lead character to essentially flashbacks is a death nail of sorts and, so far, Saw V has suffered the most from that. Don’t get me wrong, the shift from Jigsaw to Hoffman as his apprentice was done nicely but if the ends don’t justify the means, what exactly are we left with? Nothing. It’s as simple as that.

Therefore, Saw V is extremely passable and will likely disappoint fans of the series. Other than a few loose ends being tied up, this movie leaves a lot to be desired and is essentially nothing more than a set up for the inevitable Saw VI.

And to think, at one time or another this franchise began with such promise; but now, to see it gradually become worse year after year is even more unbearable to watch than some of the previous franchises that overstayed their welcome (i.e., Halloween, Friday the 13th, etc). Still, it’s all relative in a way, no matter how you look at it. But one thing’s for sure, Saw V is the ultimate buzz kill and you can trust me on that.

Rating: 1 ½ inkblots out of 5

Eagle Eye

Only an imaginative mind could make a movie like Eagle Eye work and, in watching, it seems as if the producers were banking on that same exact logic.

Forgive me if I’m wrong, or if my opinion does not conform with that of the majority, but Eagle Eye is nothing more than a stylized version of Will Smith’s Enemy of the State. That being said, to call this movie original, or even good for that matter, would be contrite on my part; so, instead, I would only feel justified in telling it like it is, rather than to support mediocrity.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m all for the ascension of Shia LaBeouf to elite, star status, but Eagle Eye is far from anything spectacular. Like I said, it’s nothing more than a recycled concept of sorts; and although some people will fail to realize this; I, for one, was not oblivious to this fact and could not help but feel a little cheated. It’s one thing to knowingly waste your money. It’s another to be misled. Allow me to explain.

Going in, I expected this movie to absolutely blow me away and have me [somewhat] on the edge of my seat; but when none of that happened, I was more upset if anything. Sure, as much as I realize technology has become a gift and a curse; the idea that we have become slaves to it doesn’t really come off well on screen and, when you really think about it, it never really has.

I don’t know. Maybe it’s just me that feels that way, but it takes quite a suspension of reality in order for a movie like Eagle Eye to come off as “believable”. None of it works in any shape or form whatsoever and the mundane plot is so convoluted that it’s no wonder the action sequences happen at such a rapid pace (i.e., it was purposely done so to distract you from all the bullshit).

Nevertheless, I’ll give credit where credit is due and I’ll argue, justly, that this movie will keep you entertained. If not for Shia LaBeouf, this movie is easily a B-movie, at best; so instead of rushing to the theater to see this mindless piece of crap, do yourself a favor and wait for it on DVD. You’ll be glad you did.

Rating: 2 inkblots out of 5

Tyler Perry’s The Family That Preys

Regardless of the fact that Tyler Perry’s films have grossed millions at the box office, critics have maintained harsh criticisms toward his work. I, myself, included. Whether it’s his formulaic approach to film making, or his ineptitude when it comes to subject matter; Tyler Perry just doesn’t get the recognition that he deserves and allow me to be the first to say that I was wrong.

Not only is this guy an exceptional director, but what he does with a pen is pure talent. No. He’ll probably never be mentioned in the same sentence as say a Steven Spielberg or even that of the Coen brothers; but his impact on the black community is something that can never be measured. His plays/films speaks to the heart of his people and with his latest film, The Family That Preys, being his first attempt at crossover appeal; I think it’s quite clear that Tyler Perry sees things for what they are, and not just black and white.

Thematic elements such as infidelity, discrimination, and verbal abuse have been commonplace in cinema, but the way a Tyler Perry production can touch on so many different issues is a true testament to Tyler Perry as a writer. Without question he’s talented and has been blessed with an extraordinary gift, but The Family That Preys may [just] be his most “complete” work to date.

I’ll be honest. My biggest criticism towards Tyler Perry has been his inability to make a “complete” film and now that he has, I guess all I can do is tip my hat. Not only is this movie good, but it reflects back to all races across the board; not to mention, again, it touches on a lot of important issues that pertain to family. Or rather, the idea of family.

Still, as much as this movie is good, it’s not without its criticisms. As expected, the plot was a typical Tyler Perry dialogue and didn’t stray from any of his previous films, however, the incorporation of white actors was a nice change of pace. Not only does a move like this show his commitment to reach a [more] wider audience, but it’s smart also. Believe it or not, but a lot of white people love Tyler Perry’s work [as well] and to have characters that look like them is a nice nod in their favor. That being said, not enough can be said about the performance of Kathy Bates in this film but, honestly, all the performances were on point. More specifically, that of Sanaa Lathan‘s. I’ve never seen her reach this range, as far as acting is concerned, so it was nice to see her be given that opportunity.

So, in conclusion, other than the plot being somewhat predictable (as far as by Tyler Perry’s standards), The Family That Preys is a real solid film. While it may not be Perry’s crowning achievement, it is however a step in the right direction towards mainstream; and dare I say, the “one” that finally won me over.

Rating: 4 ½ inkblots out of 5

Pineapple Express

Seth Rogen may not be your typical “movie star”, but his appeal is undeniable. Ever since his supporting role in The 40-Year Old Virgin, fans have clamored for his effortless brand of wit-- and low and behold, Seth delivered with Knocked Up and followed suit with SuperBad. Now, a star in his own right, Seth Rogen has become the new “it” guy in Hollywood and if Pineapple Express is any indication, his career is far from going up in smoke.

First things first, I think it goes without saying that Pineapple Express is very “pro-pot”; but even if you’ve never smoked, this movie is pretty damn funny. It definitely passes the “From the guys that brought you The 40 Year Old Virgin and etc.” seal of approval and, if nothing else, proves that [almost] anything blessed by Judd Apatow is sure to be comedic gold. That being said, Pineapple Express is [cleverly] well-written for it be a “weed” movie; and although it falls short in comparison to the movies aforementioned, it’s still something well worth seeing.

For lack of better words, call it “movie magic” if you will; but, Pineapple Express is this generation’s Half Baked. I know. To compare the two films is borderline blasphemy but, arguably, that statement makes sense. Especially when you really think abut it. I mean, my generation adored Half Baked for what it was and have responded by proclaiming it as a cult classic; but, in watching Pineapple Express, I got that same feeling that I had with Half Baked. Without question, this newer generation will adopt it as their own; and although my thesis remains to be seen, I remain confident that it will [take shape] over time. Trust me. I just know these things.

So, what’s it all about? Pineapple Express is basically about a brand of pot (of the same name) that Seth Rogen’s character, Dale, comes in contact with via his drug dealer/friend, Sal (Franco). However, when Dale witnesses a murder; his attempt to make a clean getaway goes unabated by the fact that he left some of the Pineapple Express at the scene. The only problem is, with Pineapple Express being rare and Sal being the only dealer in town that has it is, both Dale and Sal must figure out what’s going on or risk losing their lives. From there, insanity and chaos ensue; and all the while, it’s a laugh out loud riot from start to finish.

Overall, Pineapple Express is a step back from SuperBad; but is solid enough to stand on its own. While ridiculous, the plot is simple yet effective and the comedic timing of all the actors involved is on point. Combine that with the Judd Apatow seal of approval and what you have is a surefire recipe for success.

Rating: 3 ½ inkblots out of 5

Wanted

I'm not usually euphoric when it comes to movies, but ever so often I'll come across something so awe inspiring that lasts long after leaving the theater. For whatever reason, it's hard to find these kind of films, but who would ever expect that a trigger happy, shoot 'em up flick like Wanted would fall into such high regards. Lord knows I didn't and as I walked out of the theater, still reeling from what I had just seen on screen. All I could think about was how f’n awesome this movie was.

Let’s be honest. A movie like The Matrix was key in revolutionizing the Sci-Fi/action movie genre and, in doing so, it opened the doors for a movie like Wanted to [one day] be made. In the same vain, last year’s Shoot ’Em Up [also] followed this same formula but the comparison of the two films is not here nor now. Instead, the topic at hand is that of the comic book based Wanted; and as far as comic book film adaptations is concerned, Wanted is in a league of its own.

Starring James McAvoy as Wesley Gibson, Wanted weaves the tale of an elite group of assassins assembled to keep “order” and “peace”. The only question is, at what cost? Beleaguered, Wesley begins to question the moral aptitude at hand and from there, it becomes an issue of morality. All the while, the over-the-top action sequences fits everything together nicely and what you have, is one edge of your seat thriller from start to finish.

A quick note, however, Angelina Jolie proves once again why she can hold her own on screen and other than the scene where she drops her towel (that scene is priceless btw), her [overall] presence here is commanding. The same can be said for James McAvoy as well. A lot of people may not remember him as the kid from The Last King of Scotland; but just like that film opened people's eyes to Forest Whitaker, Wanted will [undoubtedly] be McAvoy's most memorable work. The way he pulled things together as Wesley was key for the movie to work, and Mcavoy came through like a seasoned vet. A job well done, I say.

In closing, Wanted may not win any awards or be recognized by any academies, but it’s shelf life will last longer than the theater. Meaning. This movie will [in deed] become a cult classic and, over time, be accepted as the new standard for over the top action. If not, hey, at least it was well worth it to hear Morgan Freeman (no less) deliver the line, “Shoot this motherfucker”. Now that’s what I call classic. Wouldn’t you agree?

Rating: 5 inkblots out of 5

Step Brothers

Will Ferrell and John C. Reilly have a unique brand of chemistry that can really only be appreciated by those who loved Talladega Nights. Now, being one of those that did, not only did I expect Step Brothers to be laugh out loud funny; but to only further cement the comedic genius of the two [as well]. --NOT to make me feel like a f'n retard.

Step Brothers, for lack of better praise, is the most idiotic, simplistic piece of Hollywood bullshit known to man and is somewhat embarrassing. You would think, two well renowned actors/comedians such as Ferrell and Reilly would have a much higher standard when it comes to their work; but Step Brothers is childish and contrite for even the simplest of minds. It has no substance whatsoever and this just in, it's not particularly funny either.

Sure, a few bright spots are here and there but those are few and far between. In no way do they cover up the deficiencies of this film, however, and for the first time, I actually found a movie that made ME feel dumb for watching it.

Why? It's quite simple. All the unnecessary profanity and vocal dexterity took away from the plot and when you do that, you're reduced to something less appealing. In laments terms--this movie is so full of itself, it's damn near committing incest right before our very eyes. As blunt as that may sound it's the truth and with that comes great responsibility. Unfortunately, the tandem of Ferrell and Reilly didn't get that memo.

Rating: 1 ½ inkblots out of 5

Hancock

Will Smith OWNS the 4th of July box office. That--we already know. Not only have his movies grossed millions worldwide, but his appeal (both foreign and domestic) has made him one of the most recognizable stars of today. Combine that with the fact that he's been fairly consistent and what you have is a bonafide star. However, with such a long list of accomplishment, comes a false sense of security; and for Will Smith, Hancock not only represents a near brush with commercial disappointment but [possibly] the beginning of the end.

I know what you're thinking. Pretty bold statement, huh? Well, by all means, I apologize for being blunt, but that's just how disappointed I was with this movie. Instead of getting a superhero movie filled with action, adventure, and wonderment--I helplessly sat through one that was [seemingly] juiced up on estrogen. And that's just being nice.

I guess most of my frustration(s) stem from the fact that this movie couldn't really make up its mind of what it wanted to be. Was it a superhero movie? A comedy? A drama? Far be it from me to decide, but I [mostly] blame the producers for trying to play all sides. No clear cut direction was taken in the thought process and it really shows. Therefore, Will Smith and company weren't really given much to work with; however, when presented with something of substance, it comes off more cheesy than anything.

So, therein lies a problem among many but mostly everything centers back to the plot. No origin of Hancock is given, nor is anything explicitly stated about how he came to be; but in not doing so, it kind of works as a gift and a curse. From one standpoint, it allows the viewers to interpret for themselves; but it also leaves them in the dark as well. So, like I was saying, it kind of goes both ways and only furthers that notion of indecisiveness that I spoke of earlier.

It's simple. Hancock is not only a microcosm of what a superhero movie should be, but also a microcosm of what a Will Smith movie should be [as well]. In no way does Hancock compare to any of his previous summer blockbusters, nor does it represent anything he's ever done. Hancock is Hancock. There's no other way to explain it. So, instead of investing your time/money on a bi-polar superhero. Ask yourself, who's really being saved here?

Rating: 2 inkblots out of 5

Tropic Thunder

In all fairness, laugh out loud comedy should be unapologetic to a certain extent; but with Ben Stiller, there seems to never be a line that can't be crossed. Stiller's particular brand of raw, in your face comedy has entertained fans for years and has not only spawned memorable pop culture references but, in a way, has defined our generation as well. Movies such as There's Something About Mary and Dodgeball represent both ends of the spectrum and although he's tried once before with the outlandish Zoolander, Tropic Thunder will [undoubtedly] go down as Stiller's finest work to date. Why? Simple. Tropic Thunder excels in the fact that it doesn't take itself seriously and knowing that allows for a premise of this nature to pull no punches.

First things first, however, if you are easily offended--I highly recommend that you do NOT see this movie. Tropic Thunder openly crosses the line on many occasions and preys on the sensitivity of those who may be watching; but only to the extent of blatant truth. In no way is any of this intended to be taken seriously and as long as you keep that in mind, you'll laugh and enjoy yourself at the same time.

So, now that that's out of the way. Tropic Thunder, for lack of a better word, is a paradox of sorts in that it is a parody of a parody. Let's face it. War movies have become mundane and/or commonplace in this day and age of ours, but I truly feel that Tropic Thunder will represent a concerted effort back towards the importance of originality. So much recycled b.s. is thrown at us constantly and instead of disallowing such behavior to continue, we feed into it by shelling out $7 bucks or so each week; only to see the same mindless crap. Now, if that's your idea of quality, then so be it. Me, on the other hand, I expect more and luckily Tropic Thunder was just that.

So, what's it all about? Usually, I would go into extensive detail and point out the highs and lows of the plot; but I think it's better served to let you find out things for yourself. Besides, critics [in my opinion] spoil things ever so slightly with some of their reviews and I, myself, feel that I would be following down that same path if I, too, were to do so. Therefore, I'll put it to you like this. Tropic Thunder offends, yet succeeds on all levels as a laugh out loud comedy and is more than worth the price of admission. Point. Blank. Period.

P.S.

Three(3) things to look out for: Booty Sweat energy drinks, Bust-a-nut bars, and "Never go full retard". LOL, you'll soon see what I mean.

Rating: 4 inkblots out of 5

Hellboy II: The Golden Army

Guillermo del Toro may not be a household name, but his visionary style of directing is [simply] one of a kind. Although he is most well-known for his brilliant work behind the adult fairy tale Pan's Labyrinth, del Toro's cinematic approach to film making is unlike any other. His sharp focus for detail, combined with his excellent use of stunning visual effects is more than meets the eye; and with his latest film, Hellboy II: The Golden Army, his quality work only continues to speak for itself.

First things first, if you were NOT a fan of the first Hellboy--then I strongly suggest that you do not see this film. Why? Well, unfortunately, I was not a fan of the first myself but, still, opted to see this film in support of del Toro; only to spend a majority of it lost and disinterested. Sure, part of that can be attributed to the face that I loathed its predecessor but, still, Hellboy II is far from a bad movie. In all fairness, it's bigger and better then it's previous counterpart and from that standpoint, I applaud the producers for expanding on an already established concept.

In essence, the Hellboy franchise is the "B" movie of comic book movies and fails to hold weight amongst such heavyweights as Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk. Not to be outdone, Hellboy's strong cult following helps in its appeal and it's fair to assume that a lot of fans will be thoroughly pleased. Unfortunately I wasn't, but I digress.

Overall, I would say that a little more could've been done with the story; but to go into extensive detail would be a waste of time. Not so much because it would require a detailed summary of the plot, but simply because I really don't care. Plain and simple, Hellboy II: The Golden Army passes with flying colors...if you're already a fan but, if not, it serves better as a late night rental from Blockbuster.

Rating: 2 inkblots out of 5

The Happening

As much as I'm a fan of M. Night Shyamalan, there's nothing I could [possibly] say to defend his latest experimental horror flick--The Happening. Following the release of Lady in the Water, critics lamented him as a "one trick pony" and unjustly, I felt the negative criticism was undeserved; but now, my opinion is starting to conform with the majority. Not only is The Happening a bad movie but, also, it creates doubt in one's mind that questions the genius (or ingenious) of a once heralded director. In all fairness, Shyamalan's wonderment is the most likable aspect of his work but potential can only go so far. People, more specifically his fans, expect more from him than any other director and being a fan, myself, The Happening is [unfortunately] nothing more than a disastrous disappointment.

I'm not the biggest environmentalist (far from it to be honest), but The Happening is nothing more than Al Gore's An Inconvenient Truth with a little bit of the horror element thrown into it. Basically, "The Happening" is an environmental crisis that starts along the northeast, spreads, and results in a mass amount of suicide. Strangely enough, the premise isn't all that bad but, trust me, not even that could save this pathetic excuse for a movie. Mark Whalberg is not convincing at all as Elliott, the protagonist of the film, and Zooey Deschanel isn't given very much to work with. Her character seems distant, egoistic and somewhat lost at times but, overall, the acting leaves a lot to be desired. For that, I shoulder the blame on Shyamalan and justly he deserves it in my opinion. His undeveloped characters have no real arc to them and in helplessly watching this movie, I fully understand why studio after studio passed up this project. Don't get me wrong, I respect M. Night for his creativity, persistence, and passion but [even] I, too, can smell bullshit when I see it.

I guess my biggest complaint about this movie was with how it was marketed. Believe it or not, Friday the 13th is a holy grail for movies with a horror element and for The Happening to be marketed to the public as such was very underlying in my opinion. While The Happening, for what's worth, is classifiable as part of the horror genre; I don't think the prospect of plants killing people went over too well with those who went out to see this. I, for one, was not pleased and expressed disinterest about 15 minutes in, but stayed in regards to see how progressively worse this train wreck was going to be. Save from the countless times the boom mic's were clearly visible and the inept portrayals of people committing suicide, this movie is more laughable than it is scary.

Yes, we get the fact that we're slowly killing the environment and that their will be consequences one day, but to make a movie about it is a waste of time. I hate to borrow a South Park reference but, Al Gore already did it. From that aspect, The Happening fails in all facets but the silver lining would not only suggest a moral responsibility but acceptability as well. Therefore, M. Night should take a long hard look in the mirror and face facts for what they are because his career is being defined right before our very eyes. As much as he may not want to admit it, his unique style of storytelling/film making has gotten progressively worse since The Sixth Sense; and being the longtime fan that I am, I'm finding it harder and harder to defend his work.

As a fan, I shouldn't have to do that but Shyamalan is unique in that way. His ambiguous reliance of self-interpretation serves more as a proverbial crutch and now it would seem that ambiguity has gotten the best of him. There's no telling what he was thinking when he sat down and decided to write The Happening but I have a better idea for a movie. The rise and fall of his career. Now, that's a horror movie.

Rating: 0 inkblots out of 5

The Incredible Hulk

Ang Lee's take on Hulk was considered a colossal flop by box office standards; however, who knew that a silver lining would come out of it. Already reveling in success from last month's Iron Man, Marvel looks poised to establish themselves as a bankable entity; and with The Incredible Hulk, that trend will surely continue. No longer is the focus on more character driven, high arching story lines but rather non-stop action. From that standpoint, The Incredible Hulk delivers in every way possible so unless you have a real dislike for comic book movies, this film will surely be a guilty pleasure for many. I, myself, included.

First and foremost, I didn't necessarily hate Ang Lee's version; but I will agree that it was excruciatingly bad. Too much of the focus was on the origin of Hulk and while I agree that a back story is sometimes a good thing, I felt like it took away from Ang's film and made it that much worse. Luckily, this new Hulk sums things up with a brief montage in the opening credits and from there, things start to roll.

Starring Edward Norton as Bruce Banner/Hulk, this new film begins like a espionage, spy thriller but slowly picks up with every passing frame. I'll admit, even Edward Norton impressed me with his performance here; so much so that Eric Bana's portrayal seems like a distant memory. Not to be outdone, the supporting cast all thrive in their roles and add depth to an already great movie. I'll admit, I've never cared much for Liv Tyler but her performance here more than makes up for her role in The Strangers. While both films showed off her range as an actress, Hulk brings out the best of her and is really what makes the "compassionate" part of this film work. As sappy as it may seem, Liv and Edward have great chemistry on screen and a majority of their scenes are joyous to watch. In relation, the CGI/special effects are amazing [as well] and rivals that of Iron Man by the slimest of margins. If anything, Marvel proved that they're well aware of what their doing and if Iron Man and The Incredible Hulk are any indication of what's to come, I can hardly wait for this [much anticipated] Avengers movie they're building up to.

Speaking of that, you could tell that the last scene of The Incredible Hulk was purposely shot ambiguously in regards of leaving the door open for a sequel; but it's the Tony Stark cameo before the credits that raises a lot of intrigue. Like I said, this Avengers movie will be a real good look for the Marvel franchise so, my fingers are crossed in hopes that they can pull it off and so far they're two for two. The Incredible Hulk smashes it's predecessor in every possible way and is as every bit as good as Iron Man. Real talk! Therefore, rejoice comic book fans. They finally got something right.

Rating: 4 inkblots out of 5

Kung Fu Panda

Animated movies are a sure thing at the box office and, next to Pixar, DreamWorks Animation has reaped quite a bit of that success over the years. Responsible for such hits as Madagascar, The Shrek franchise, and Over The Hedge, it's obvious that these guys know what they're doing; and with their latest release, Kung Fu Panda, that lucrative trend will surely continue.

Ok, I realize that I'm 21-years old and that a movie like this is not something I should be into but, just in watching it, it really was something that made me feel like a kid again. Long gone are those days of yesterday and as much as I would love to travel back in time and re-live life where nothing else seemed to matter, it's comforting to know that a movie (let alone an animated movie) can have that same effect on you. Yet and still, Kung Fu Panda is an excellent animated film and is fun for the entire family. Not since last year's Ratatouille have I enjoyed anything more and as far as I'm concerned, DreamWorks animation is slowly, but surely, starting to close that gap between them and Pixar. Then again, maybe I'm getting a little ahead of myself as Pixar is set to release WALL-E in the next couple of weeks but, something's telling me that it will not be as successful as other projects of years past. For better or worse, that remains to be seen, however, and I guess the next couple of weeks will unfold in due time; but all the while, Kung Fu Panda has set the standard for the summer and I'd be hard pressed to find anything that can top it.

So, what's it all about? Kung Fu Panda is basically about a lowly Panda who dreams of becoming a martial arts master. Voiced by the incomparable Jack Black, Po the Panda is "chosen" as the one will become the legendary Dragon Warrior and from there, it's an adventure unlike any other. Just like most animated films, the underlying theme is one of "will" and "believing in your self" and Kung Fu Panda manages to tie everything together quite nicely. The animation is on point and the fight scenes are some of the best you'll ever see for a cartoon but, it's the voice acting that makes this movie work. Believe it or not , Jack Black is not as annoying as you would think and is able to, actually, pull this sort of thing off. Kids will love his portrayal of Po and if all the laughter that abounded while watching this at the local theater was any indication, I'm guessing that a sequel is a no brainer.

Overall, Kung Fu Panda delivers in every possible way but only suffers in that it starts out kind of slow. Once things pick up, however, the movie makes for fun for the whole family and will surely become a guilty pleasure for quite a few. I, for one, was thoroughly impressed and was satisfied with the end result but, don't take my word for it. Go out and see it for yourself but don't be surprised if that kid inside of you, has you smiling all the while. The more you embrace it, the more fun you'll have and, trust me, sometimes trying NOT to smile is the hardest thing in the world.

Rating: 3 ½ inkblots out of 5