[Click images for larger view; Click here to view more pics]
I find it hard to believe that Kim Kardashian regrets doing Playboy when she turns right around and poses nude for, yet, another magazine. Nudity is nudity regardless of if its in the name of art; but my question is, shouldn't doing a porno be more damaging to the Kardashian name as a brand?
It's no secret that the porno she did with Ray J and the spread in Playboy came long before the success she's having now but, personally, I feel to dismiss those things as regrets would be a mistake. Both helped her be the sex symbol/icon that she is today so I'm not buying any of this bullshit she says. Everything she does is calculated down to the smallest of detail and I will always hold that to be true.
As for this latest spread of hers in W magazine, I have to say that I find it to be more natural than the one she did for Playboy. None of those pictures showed off that voluptuous shape of hers that she's known for and, keeping it in the sense of art, I think this will be one of those calculated risks of hers that will pay dividends once more people react to it.
At least, one could only imagine.
It's no secret that the porno she did with Ray J and the spread in Playboy came long before the success she's having now but, personally, I feel to dismiss those things as regrets would be a mistake. Both helped her be the sex symbol/icon that she is today so I'm not buying any of this bullshit she says. Everything she does is calculated down to the smallest of detail and I will always hold that to be true.
As for this latest spread of hers in W magazine, I have to say that I find it to be more natural than the one she did for Playboy. None of those pictures showed off that voluptuous shape of hers that she's known for and, keeping it in the sense of art, I think this will be one of those calculated risks of hers that will pay dividends once more people react to it.
At least, one could only imagine.
0 comments:
Post a Comment